11 Comments

Can a dog smell GOLD or Bitcoins?

Expand full comment

I refer you to Adam Sniff.

Expand full comment

Two points. 1) The latest highway robbery scam occurs in jetways of major airports where local law enforcement (city police & county sheriffs) pretend to be “just like TSA” and hoodwink unsuspecting passengers to “additional screening” just prior to boarding. Drug dogs are often used for passengers that don’t consent to searches. The Feds and the local cops split the haul of cash. The pretext is that whatever city you’re flying to is “a known drug haven” and if you’re traveling there while carrying cash, it can only be for the purposes of buying drugs. Guilty until proven innocent. They’ll tell you that you can hand over the cash on the spot and board your flight, or be arrested and go down to the station for the probable cause of being a drug mule traveling to a city known for drugs. Folks handover their cash rather than miss their flight. 2) whether one the highway or jetway, one way to fight this is to inform the LEO that when no drugs or paraphernalia are found after the drug dog’s fake hit, you’ll be filing an affidavit of non-performance on the K9 officer and the dog with every legal jurisdiction in the country. All judges, courts, and attorneys. That way every case involving the dog will have to deal with a record of false positives. Soon, their investment in the dog is worthless. This tactic pierces the aura of a dog’s infallibility. Also, you have a right to film LEO. Ensure the dog’s “hit” is filmed. The cops will try to stand in front of you to prevent this. Call them out in it and make them answer the question, captured one their body cam, if they’re trying to ensure you can’t film the “hit.”

To stop this massive erosion of our rights, citizens must first know their rights and be willing to accept some discomfort by missing a flight or calling their bluff in a way that may lead to a detainment or arrest. Cops will only stop when the lawsuits and financial settlements pile up. Our culture is now broken and coarse with a dramatic loss of national character driven by honesty, ethics, and courage. LEOs come from the culture. They’ll be no more honest or apt to do the right thing than anyone else in our culture, despite training and taking an oath. What we as citizens permit, we promote. Freedom is dangerous. Unless we are will to accept some danger in our dealing with LEO, we’ll soon have no Freedom.

Expand full comment

Lawfare is becoming far too common

Expand full comment

A common misconception is that the dogs are alerting to drugs when in fact they are trying to warn their handlers that the currency is unbacked and fiat.

Expand full comment

it’s mostly up to the states to set their own laws. rarely do states follow federal statutes. pennsylvania has the most stringent statutes to protect citizens and therefore even if a dog hits on a car the officers still have to get permission from the operator or apply for a search warrant.

Expand full comment

Great article 👊🏼

Expand full comment

Wow. Dogs are mere tools for investigation, and surely any 'finds' have to be verified / quantified by the humans in order to bring prosecution? UK law is a mess, but it seems USA law has some very serious issues going on. A perfect cover for State Capture.

Expand full comment

There are many other forfeiture of cars, especially. Everyone knows that if you are cruising for a date, you are guilty of using the car in furtherance of prostitution.

Expand full comment

Harvey Silverglate needs to update his book. We're committing at least four felonies a day without knowing it.

Expand full comment

Being a dog lover my first thought was "f*ck anybody who doesn't like dogs." But my better nature took over, plus my memory of my dear departed mother who didn't like dogs. But as I got into the article I realized it was less about dogs and more about the 4th Amendment and legal standards for reasonableness. So not really a knock on dogs. To establish reasonableness to the courts, dog handlers have to establish both their own training, and then the training of the dogs and its past record in establishing probable cause for searches. Every dog sniff has to be documented by the dog handler, means lots of paperwork. I was never a dog handler but from conversations with dog handlers, I know most want nothing to do with unreliable dogs who alert constantly and the search turns up nothing. Means lots of administrative paperwork and headaches for the cop, not to mention what it does for the dog's self image.

Expand full comment