No More Debates, No More Mistakes
The Trump campaign makes the right choice to not debate again.
Strategically, I think the Trump campaign is making the right decision by saying there will not be a third debate. It could be strategy to get terms he wants for another debate, but I’m hoping it is what it appears to be on its face, closing the book on further debates.
Trump didn’t “win” the first debate, but I don’t think that’s why he’s not agreeing to another debate. And I know a lot of people are going to write this off as Trump being scared to debate Kamala Harris again, but I think we all know that’s not the case. I believe this is the right move, likely being made for multiple strategic reasons which I want to explain.
First, let’s not forget that Kamala Harris has had ample opportunity to agree to another debate already but has chosen not to do so. She declined offers from networks like NBC and Fox in advance of the first debate and only brought up the idea of another debate after the last one. Her lack of courage and indecision in not agreeing to another debate should rightfully come back to bite her in the ass. Harris wants another bite at the apple because she didn’t do as badly as everybody thought she would, and now she can’t have it because she didn’t believe in herself enough to agree to terms ahead of time. Tough rocks for her.
Second, not doing a debate pigeonholes Harris to the poor policy explanations and reasoning she put forth in the last debate. The entire world watched both candidates this week, and though Harris may have performed better artistically, she came up light on policy prescriptions and details on her plans are for crucial issues like the economy and immigration. This was reflected in several post-debate interviews, including ones from Reuters and CNN, where independent voters were not swayed to her side. She was given a chance to talk policy and thought it would be far more useful to take jabs at Donald Trump instead. As I noted the night of the debate, this may have been a short-term success, but as the hours turn to days after the last debate and independent-minded critical thinkers start looking for more substance, it’s going to backfire.
Third, Harris’s team was asking for provisions and rule changes up to the very last minute of the debate. Putting aside the fact that Trump already did another debate with an entirely different candidate before knocking him out of the race after agreeing to the rules set by the Democratic Party, Harris tried to change the rules of the ABC debate all the way up until the last minute, asking for mics to be live on the day of. As I’ve commented before, Democrats are obsessed with micromanaging every last detail of these debates and their candidate because they lack significant substance on policy. Harris’ appearance was more of a successful public relations event than it was an opportunity to explain her policy positions to the American people. Trump, so far, has done two debates on enemy territory, CNN and ABC, and has not been shy about taking interviews or holding press conferences throughout his entire campaign. Putting policy aside in favor of nitpicky tactics of trying to modify every last detail so the opposing airhead candidate has her best chance to deliver some type of catchphrase or polish on her flip flops is simply not something Republicans need to put up with again.
Fourth, the next debate will be the vice presidential debate, and JD Vance is far more articulate in explaining policy positions than Donald Trump is. If policy is going to rule the day, I’m certain Vance will out-joust Tim Walz. I’m basing this on watching both of their media appearances over the last month or so and common-sense policy prescriptions that I think most Americans in the middle are looking for. Not having another presidential debate shows the Republicans’ confidence in JD Vance, and frankly, I think he’s going to do a significantly better job than Trump did. It’ll make the vice presidential debate the official sendoff for both sides heading into the general election. Tim Walz can brush up on how best to spin his way through sounding like his administration actually has policy ideas, but I’m not sure there’s anything he can do to keep pace with Vance in a debate.
Finally, news networks don’t deserve the ratings of another debate or the trust of the American people, whether Democrats know it or not. The previous debate was so blindingly biased towards Harris, both in the lines of questioning and in how the moderators interjected on her behalf, that network news in general doesn’t deserve to be trusted with another debate. Megyn Kelly said it best in her post-debate analysis when she stated that Republicans should never agree to another debate after what took place this week. As I’ve noted, I think the American public will see the objective truth that this was an ambush on Donald Trump and not an objective forum for two candidates to debate each other on the merits.
The mainstream media simply cannot be trusted to hold court on political discussions without injecting their biases into them; it’s that simple. Looking back now, I think CNN conducted their debate in a fair fashion because they wanted Joe Biden out of the race. With him out of the way, they were free to do everything they could to protect their candidate, Kamala Harris.
By Trump stepping away from another debate, it’s going to embolden his base, and it’s also going to embolden Harris’. Harris’s camp will claim that he’s too scared to do another one, while Trump’s camp will wonder why he ever agreed to do a debate on ABC to begin with. The excuse Trump is using about a prizefighter knocking somebody out and their opponent immediately demanding a rematch may or may not be true. I think Harris is asking for another debate because she thinks she won, and I just think this is how Trump is spinning it.
The people in the middle—the critical-thinking, independent, undecided voters—will now be forced to ask why another debate isn’t happening. They’ll go back and rewatch the last one and see it for what it is, in my opinion. And if that happens, they’ll side with Trump.
QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer on my About page here. This post represents my opinions only. In addition, please understand I am an idiot and often get things wrong and lose money. I may own or transact in any names mentioned in this piece at any time without warning. Contributor posts and aggregated posts have been hand selected by me, have not been fact checked and are the opinions of their authors. They are either submitted to QTR by their author, reprinted under a Creative Commons license with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. I may or may not own names I write about and are watching. Sometimes I’m bullish without owning things, sometimes I’m bearish and do own things. Just assume my positions could be exactly the opposite of what you think they are just in case. All positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important.
Like you I am a libertarian and disgusted by both sides, I truly think we deserve so much better. In fact if it were not for the disgusting behavior of the Democrats, I likely would have voted for RFK… but here we are. As a woman I felt compelled to respond to your comment, not once have I ever felt degraded or dismissed by JD Vance’s comments or Trumps behavior… my value and worth are not determined by random strangers - male or female. While I do not necessarily agree with Vance’s stance on women, children, or cats, those are his values and opinions, they have nothing to do with me. I feel we have become hyper focused on identity politics, feelings,emotions & to a degree it is what is becoming our undoing.Sure I could get my panties in a bunch over some cat lady comment and whatever other nonsense has been said( or taken out of context ) and vote for the current admin, but what would that leave me with? What would it leave my 4 daughters and my son with? The current admin goes against literally everything I stand for and I might add, literally everything we libertarians stand for… how could I possibly vote for someone simply bc they haven’t offended my gender, when they very things they stand for offend far more. Quite frankly as a woman , it would crush my soul to see Kamala Harris become the first female president. The first should be brilliant, charismatic and a born leader -she is none of those things. So in the end if I must choose between 2 flawed personalities , I have to choose the one who I trust not to drive this country the rest of the way over the cliff.
Thanks for the update.
Meanwhile, things are brewing in Ukraine/Russia (rare earth's war), Draghi gave a depressing speech about EU economy, how they have no weapons, no money and no people (terrible birth rates), which means no more production...oh and Volkswagen may shut down IN Germany where they of course lost their cheap gas...after letting whoever blow up Norstream blow up their own economy. All brilliant moves by the West, huh?
Zelensky, the comedian who is no longer president (no elections) in Ukraine (lapdog of neocons and clearly deranged) cusses out Brazil and China, never has anyone spoke like that to the Chinese. Ukraine, who just received another loan from the IMF after the current bondholders just took a shave (imagine the deals Blackrock thinks it's gonna swoop up). Brazil is, without a doubt, gone LULU nuts with the censorship of X and the vax mandates. Dr Bill and WHO need another hit of vaccine money so we've got monkeypox (contained within the homosexual population) and we have a new, yup...you guessed it, another vax! Seriously the world is simply going mad. Oh, and while we continue to senselessly argue about the 'lesser of two evils', Putin just signed a HUGE deal for lithium https://tass.com/economy/1837205
Make American Great Again.....or should I say Hooray for Hollywood, we had the world fooled for a century!
I'm going back under my rock, headed to the Rockies for the start of autumn and then Japan until late November. Aspens and maples....a much prettier view then what is about to begin...Sigh.