Discussion about this post

User's avatar
GT's avatar

How is nuclear energy the safest option? It is definitely a viable one, but why the safest? On one hand you have the by-product of the nuclear reaction - waste. And on the other hand, it is far from safe. In case of a war your enemies know exactly where the reactors are. One internal mistake in one reactor has cost more than one can quantify. And there are thousands of them around the world. How is that safe?

As far as gold is concerned, I do agree with you on some level. However, why is it that you exclude crypto from the equation all together? Crypto and gold serve exactly the same purpose. Discrete number of units in floatation, completely decentralised and cannot be manipulated. Why in your view those two are so much different from each other..?

Expand full comment
Paine Of Glass's avatar

Thanks, You’ve been consistent on this point for awhile now, and I’ve followed suit since the original rec brought it to my attention. URA and URNM been creeping back up day by day to the point where we already round tripped back to 3 months ago before the “sell off”. Uranium and Nuclear are my long term bet I feel best about. It’s basically a bet on reality. Long our stuff and the kids stuff.

Expand full comment
25 more comments...

No posts