Money Supply Growth Accelerates And Hits A 27-Month High

...much of this “robust growth” is being fueled not by sound economic conditions, but by government spending.

By Ryan McMaken, Mises Institute

Money-supply growth rose year over year in November for the fourth month in a row, the first time this has happened since the four months ending in October of 2022. The current trend in money-supply growth suggests a significant and continued turnaround from more than a year of historically large contractions in the money supply that occurred throughout much of 2023 and 2024. As of November, the money supply appears to be entering a new and accelerating growth period.

In November, year-over-year growth in the money supply was at 2.35 percent. That’s a 27-month high and the largest year-over-year increase since September 2022. November’s growth rate was up from October’s growth rate of 1.45 percent. It’s a large reversal from November 2023’s ear-over-year decline of 8.5 percent. Until the current trend of accelerating money-supply growth began, the US money supply had been in the midst of the largest drop in money supply we’ve seen since the Great Depression. Prior to 2023, at no other point for at least sixty years had the money supply fallen by so much.

That downward trend now appears to be well over. Indeed, when we look at month-to-month changes in the money supply, we also find an upward trend. The money supply has increased each month from July through November of 2024. The money supply increased by 0.95 percent from October to November. That’s a nine-month high and is the third-largest increase since March of 2022.

The money supply metric used here—the “true,” or Rothbard-Salerno, money supply measure (TMS)—is the metric developed by Murray Rothbard and Joseph Salerno, and is designed to provide a better measure of money supply fluctuations than M2. (The Mises Institute now offers regular updates on this metric and its growth.)

In recent months, M2 growth rates have followed a similar course to TMS growth rates, although M2 is growing faster than TMS. In November, the M2 growth rate was 3.73 percent. That’s up from October’s growth rate of 3.13 percent. November’s growth rate was also up from November 2023’s rate of negative 3.27 percent. Month over month, M2 increased by 0.94 percent from October to November. That’s the largest month-to-month growth rate in nine months.

Money supply growth can often be a helpful measure of economic activity and an indicator of coming recessions. During periods of economic boom, money supply tends to grow quickly as commercial banks make more loans. On the other hand, two or three years before a recession begins, we tend to see periods during which money supply growth slows or turns negative. It should be noted that the money supply does not need to actually contract to signal a recession. As shown by Ludwig von Mises, recessions are often preceded by a mere slowing in money supply growth.

All that said, recessions tend not to become apparent until after the money supply has begun to accelerate again after a period of slowing. This was the case in the early 1990’s recession, the Dot-com Bust of 2001, and the Great Recession. This may be the trend we are seeing now.

Indeed, the acceleration in money-supply growth that we’ve seen in recent months corresponds with new efforts by the Federal Reserve to force down the target policy interest rate, thus spurring more money creation. In September, the Fed’s FOMC cut the target rate by 50 basis points. Such a sizable cut to the target rate is usually followed by a recession since the Fed usually only implements such a large cut when it fears an approaching recession. The Fed cut the target rate again in November, and then again in December.

Moreover, the Fed’s return to dovish policy strongly suggests that the Fed has no plans to unwind the trillions of dollars it added to the economy over the past five years. In spite of last year’s sizable drops in total money supply, the trend in money-supply totals remains well above what existed during the twenty-year period from 1989 to 2009. To return to this trend, the money supply would have to drop another $3 trillion or so—or 15 percent—down to a total below $15 trillion. Moreover, as of November, total money supply was still up more than 35 percent (or about $5 trillion) since January 2020.

Since 2009, the TMS money supply is now up by more than 192 percent. (M2 has grown by 150 percent in that period.) Out of the current money supply of $19.3 trillion, nearly 26 percent of that has been created since January 2020. Since 2009, more than $12 trillion of the current money supply has been created. In other words, nearly two-thirds of the total existing money supply have been created just in the past thirteen years.

Apparently, the Fed now is quite comfortable with this, in spite of the fact that there is no sign of CPI inflation rates returning to the Fed’s arbitrary two-percent price-inflation goal. For example, both CPI and core CPI increased in November’s month-to-month change. The CPI’s year-over-year change increased to 2.7 percent in November. The core CPI remained flat at 3.3 percent over the same period. In other words, the Fed does not appear to be prioritizing reductions in price inflation rates.

Money supply changes and CPI rarely follow a linear or one-to-one relationship, but with the Fed returning to a policy of easy money, after adding trillions of dollars to the money supply in just a few years, we can expect this to fuel further increases to both asset price inflation and consumer price inflation in coming years.

The Fed and the Federal Government Need Lower Interest Rates

So, why did the Fed return to pushing down interest rates, even with so much covid-era money still sloshing around in the economy? One answer lies in the fact that the US Treasury requires low interest rates to manage its enormous $36 trillion debt.

The US Treasury is already on track for ringing up a deficit of more than $3 trillion for the 2025 fiscal year. This puts upward pressure on overall interest rates, and especially on Treasurys. The US Treasury must offer higher yields on its debt as it floods the market with more and more federal debt. The Treasury expects the Fed to intervene to keep these interest rates from getting out of control. Otherwise, the US Treasury would find itself overwhelmed by interest payments on its ballooning debt. The fact that the Fed has chosen to force back down its target interest rate provides the Fed with more opportunities to engage in open market operations and buy up “excess” government debt as is deemed necessary to help put a lid on Treasury rates.

It looks like this intervention is going to be necessary, and investor demand for low-yield Treasurys is not what the US government is hoping for. Since September, in spite of the Fed’s efforts to bring interest rates back down, the bond markets have not been helpful. For example, the interest rate in the 10-year Treasury surged on Wednesday, reaching 4.73%, the highest since April. This reflects on overall upward trend that began in September in spite of the Fed’s return to rate cuts. Over that time, the average interest rate on 30-year mortgages has also headed upward, and is now near seven percent.

The fact that the bond markets aren’t cooperating with the Fed suggests that bond investors expect what the central bank is unwilling to admit: that deficit spending is likely to keep heading upward, fueling price inflation as a result.

That is, many bond investors suspect that as deficits continue to mount, the Fed will be forced to intervene to mop up excess Treasurys in order to keep yields from rising to unacceptable levels. To make these purchases, the Fed will have to create new money, and bond investors know that is likely to lead to more inflation. Eventually, to combat this price inflation, the Fed will again be forced to allow interest rates to rise again. Thus, we now see rising longer-term rates.

Or, as Bloomberg summed it up yesterday:

The 20-year Treasury bond offered a grim warning as a selloff fueled by inflationary angst gripped global debt markets: 5% yields are already here.

“The US market is having an outsized effect as investors grapple with sticky inflation, robust growth and the hyper-uncertainty of incoming President Trump’s agenda,” said James Athey, a portfolio manager at Marlborough Investment Management.

Moreover, much of this “robust growth” is being fueled not by sound economic conditions, but by government spending. That translates into even more upward pressure in interest rates, and in future price inflation.

All of this reflects the new acceleration in the money supply, with the Fed’s apparent approval.

QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer on my About page here. This post represents my opinions only. In addition, please understand I am an idiot and often get things wrong and lose money. I may own or transact in any names mentioned in this piece at any time without warning. Contributor posts and aggregated posts have been hand selected by me, have not been fact checked and are the opinions of their authors. They are either submitted to QTR by their author, reprinted under a Creative Commons license with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author.

This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. I may or may not own names I write about and are watching. Sometimes I’m bullish without owning things, sometimes I’m bearish and do own things. Just assume my positions could be exactly the opposite of what you think they are just in case. If I’m long I could quickly be short and vice versa. I won’t update my positions. All positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important.